PeacefulMe wrote:daniel wrote:--and yes, it does precede a magnetic polar reversal.
If this answer is somewhere in your papers Daniel, please forgive me for asking...but what exactly does a magnetic pole reversal entail?
The earth behaves just like the Sun. In my papers, and many times on this site, I've referred to
Prof. KVK Nehru's paper on Glimpses into the Structure of the Sun. Even if you can't understand the technical details, what he demonstrates with the sunspot cycles is exactly the same thing that happens on the planets, but at a longer time frame (using the updated geochronology). These vortex anomalies you see are just "earthspots" being generated by the same cause and reason as sunspots. And just like the sunspots, every so often the magnetic poles reverse--north becomes south, and south becomes north. And the cycle starts all over again.
Understand that this
may not correspond to an earth expansion event, which is what causes a physical relocation of the continents about the rotational axis. It is from
Peret's research, "At the Earth's Core: The Geophysics of Planetary Evolution" that the reason for a reorienting of the continents occurs, namely ice pack mass allows the continental crust to shift over the slippery asthenosphere, that separates it from the mantle. So odds are, the ice pack will end up at the equator, which is the minimum energy configuration. NOW CONSIDER THIS... if someone goes and melts the polar caps BEFORE an expansion event hits, the orientation of the Earth may stay exactly the same way it is now, because the existing, equatorial bulge would not be thrown out of balance. Just something to think about, as one watches the ice disappear along the Greenland coast...