Page 1 of 2

Sunspot cycle anomalies

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:50 am
by Ilkka
Something weird happening in sunspot cycle, just read about it in this finnish news site.

Here is the link from finnish site to the original source. It was said that the researchers are astonished by this behavior. Interesting.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1 ... 0409194498

I think this sunspot and magnetic anomalies are just beginning.

Re: Sunspot cycle anomalies

Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 8:55 pm
by daniel
Ilkka wrote:Something weird happening in sunspot cycle, just read about it in this finnish news site.

Here is the link from finnish site to the original source. It was said that the researchers are astonished by this behavior. Interesting.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1 ... 0409194498

I think this sunspot and magnetic anomalies are just beginning.
If you are able to understand Nehru's description of how sunspots work in the Reciprocal System in his paper, Glimpses into the Structure of the Sun, then you can explain it to them!

Sunspots arise from thredules in the solar core.
Thredules are the consequence of ultra-high speed thermal motion.
Thermal motion is the consequence of age-limit fission of heavy elements.
The fission of heavy elements is controlled by the magnetic ionization level.
Two possibilities arise: God forgot to stoke the furnace with heavy elements, or the magnetic ionization level has dropped.

If Wilcock is right and the solar system is moving through a cloud/protostar, there should be an abundance of elements for the sun to combust. Considering the planets and moons are leaving "trails" in this dust, there should be more than enough fuel for the fire.

That brings us to magnetic ionization... have you noticed how hot/bright the sun has been over the last sunspot cycle (11 years)? Consider that--and you have your answer to the anomalies.

Re: Sunspot cycle anomalies

Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 4:09 am
by Ilkka
Cant recall the last 11 years, because of wild youth years before that and during so didnt make notes on the temperature levels. However the other day I saw this dream where I was back in 2002 (I was 18 back then) my dream self was "back in time" and then came along this character that resembled my friend from school times (equivalent to senior high I guess) and he said that "its 2013" but I said that "no its 2002" and then he said something about the hill we climbed just up and I said "Yea it took me 30 mins to get up" in the dream the rise was like 1-2 meters so... that should be just one leap but dream self couldn't jump up I guess.

Back to the sunspots and stuff, I haven't read that one but some other one that was about the heavy elements and their destruction limits in the sun and how sun has these cycles when them elements fall towards the core and then go "boom" :D.

Re: Sunspot cycle anomalies

Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 1:59 pm
by Evansville64
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhJW2voi ... 5nP2xzFTWQ (2:30 mark) An unprecedented sunspot has made the news today, we look to be in some type of critical mass.. As far as my Holodeck experiences, and crazy weather, personal events. This is very promising news :)

Re: Sunspot cycle anomalies

Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:05 pm
by MrTwig
daniel wrote:
Ilkka wrote:Something weird happening in sunspot cycle, just read about it in this finnish news site.

Here is the link from finnish site to the original source. It was said that the researchers are astonished by this behavior. Interesting.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1 ... 0409194498

I think this sunspot and magnetic anomalies are just beginning.
If you are able to understand Nehru's description of how sunspots work in the Reciprocal System in his paper, Glimpses into the Structure of the Sun, then you can explain it to them!

Sunspots arise from thredules in the solar core.
Thredules are the consequence of ultra-high speed thermal motion.
Thermal motion is the consequence of age-limit fission of heavy elements.
The fission of heavy elements is controlled by the magnetic ionization level.
Two possibilities arise: God forgot to stoke the furnace with heavy elements, or the magnetic ionization level has dropped.

If Wilcock is right and the solar system is moving through a cloud/protostar, there should be an abundance of elements for the sun to combust. Considering the planets and moons are leaving "trails" in this dust, there should be more than enough fuel for the fire.

That brings us to magnetic ionization... have you noticed how hot/bright the sun has been over the last sunspot cycle (11 years)? Consider that--and you have your answer to the anomalies.
Actually I have read that! It is a natural process that all suns go through and ours too. Wilcock also said we are passing through the galactic plane with dramatic results to follow. There is also that time thing with repeating changes like clock work to our way of living every eon or so. If what you have in your last paper is right, we are the oldest system around for quite a few light years.

Have you read "Electric Flying Machines" Thomas Townsend Brown? http://customers.hbci.com/~wenonah/history/brown.htm Nice read when it gets going.

Re: Sunspot cycle anomalies

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:44 am
by Lozion
Wilcock also said we are passing through the galactic plane with dramatic results to follow. There is also that time thing with repeating changes like clock work to our way of living every eon or so. If what you have in your last paper is right, we are the oldest system around for quite a few light years.
Where does he get his knowledge on this? daniel refers to this in another thread also but what scientific data supports this? Or is it in his dreams that Wilcock came up with that? I dont know about you but Wilcock as been losing his cred for me and although I want to blieve we are going through the Galactic Plane, I need evidence...

Re: Sunspot cycle anomalies

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:22 am
by Ilkka
Lozion wrote:Where does he get his knowledge on this? daniel refers to this in another thread also but what scientific data supports this? Or is it in his dreams that Wilcock came up with that? I dont know about you but Wilcock as been losing his cred for me and although I want to blieve we are going through the Galactic Plane, I need evidence...
If you want evidence then you should go to DWs website and search the info from there and I think he has some links to the original sources. I think that it was his earliest videos that he discussed these galactic "stuff" like "2012 Enigma" and the other one which name I dont remember anymore. These videos are old like 3-5 years old videos. And totally free in the internet and youtube. DW has his own youtube account aswell where there are some of these videos if not all. Its something like "davidwilcock333" if I remember correctly. And I think I heard him say that he has sources to some of those things he says in those videos and "Daniel" in this site is one of them sources. Some of those original sites may have been taken down already. Never did visit any of those sites exept "lawofone.info" site and maybe very few others. I'm too lazy on that note, since never so much interested of some of those things discussed.

Re: Sunspot cycle anomalies

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:59 am
by daniel
Lozion wrote:Where does he get his knowledge on this? daniel refers to this in another thread also but what scientific data supports this? Or is it in his dreams that Wilcock came up with that? I dont know about you but Wilcock as been losing his cred for me and although I want to blieve we are going through the Galactic Plane, I need evidence...
Wilcock got some of his info from me on that, as I passed on some data to him from the 1950s that discussed climate change due to the solar system entering a "dustier" region of space--in which it was saying it would take another 50 years for it to reach us, but they needed to get some "emergency management" plans in place. (Known as "Alternative 3" in the conspiracy circle.) Well, "it's heerrreee!"

Since I've been around most of that time, I've noticed the changes in the night sky since I was a child. For one thing, stars have gotten dimmer (visually). Astronomers say it's from light pollution, but living in areas where there isn't any, I can see the difference. I distinctly remember being able to count all 7 "sisters" of the Pleiades when a child. You can only see 6 now and there are fewer, visible stars in the night sky.

If Bruce's research on the "scale" of astronomy being wrong is correct (see RS2 post: Visibility of Stars and Galaxies (Problem) ), then you can infer what is actually going on, because what we observe as "far away galaxies" may actually be "nearby solar systems," which gives us excellent, observational data on what a solar system actually looks like, from the outside. If you look at the image in Comment #13 of that post, where he plots the visible galaxies, you can see that there is data missing--a toroidal belt that makes distant objects unobservable from our solar system. That infers that our solar system looks much like the photo shown in Comment #14--a large disc of dirt and rock, far out (probably named the Oort cloud). When you look at other galaxy photos as "solar systems," you see that chunks of those outer rings break off and spiral down into the central core/sun--which is probably what is happening to us, right now.

If this is the case, then to quote Egon from Ghostbusters, "It would be bad." Though it does explain the quiet sun, regarding sunspots. We cannot observe atoms and dust entering the sun (too small and too bright a background). What may be happening is that this dust is forming an insulating blanket on the corona, increasing the amounts of plasma and not yet sinking (through increased mass via atomic fusion) to the core where it can be combusted. The result: the core runs low on fuel and burns slower and quieter--until that dust mass sinks in, then it will get "interesting" with all that "gas" being poured on the core fire.

Of course, like any contained system under pressure--and higher pressure now--when a sunspot thredule DOES break through, it should show some more energetic characteristics than the sunspots of the regular cycle. I believe one of those sunspots is being observed, right now.
Ilkka wrote:If you want evidence then you should go to DWs website and search the info from there and I think he has some links to the original sources. I think that it was his earliest videos that he discussed these galactic "stuff" like "2012 Enigma" and the other one which name I dont remember anymore. These videos are old like 3-5 years old videos. And totally free in the internet and youtube. DW has his own youtube account aswell where there are some of these videos if not all. Its something like "davidwilcock333" if I remember correctly. And I think I heard him say that he has sources to some of those things he says in those videos and "Daniel" in this site is one of them sources. Some of those original sites may have been taken down already. Never did visit any of those sites exept "lawofone.info" site and maybe very few others. I'm too lazy on that note, since never so much interested of some of those things discussed.
I've seen David's data on a dustier solar system back in 2005, and it does agree with the other reports I've seen from half a century ago. The only difference is that we aren't going through any galactic plane; it's just a normal process of stellar recondensation from the old supernova.

Re: Sunspot cycle anomalies

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:23 pm
by Lozion
Wilcock got some of his info from me on that, as I passed on some data to him from the 1950s that discussed climate change due to the solar system entering a "dustier" region of space--in which it was saying it would take another 50 years for it to reach us, but they needed to get some "emergency management" plans in place. (Known as "Alternative 3" in the conspiracy circle.) Well, "it's heerrreee!"
Yes, I'm familiar with the Alternatives material from the days of now deceased (brutally murdered in his home by a local sheriff) Bill Cooper and I agree it would explain the Cabal's need for geoengineering , DUMBs and such.
If Bruce's research on the "scale" of astronomy being wrong is correct (see RS2 post: Visibility of Stars and Galaxies (Problem) ), then you can infer what is actually going on, because what we observe as "far away galaxies" may actually be "nearby solar systems," which gives us excellent, observational data on what a solar system actually looks like, from the outside. If you look at the image in Comment #13 of that post, where he plots the visible galaxies, you can see that there is data missing--a toroidal belt that makes distant objects unobservable from our solar system. That infers that our solar system looks much like the photo shown in Comment #14--a large disc of dirt and rock, far out (probably named the Oort cloud). When you look at other galaxy photos as "solar systems," you see that chunks of those outer rings break off and spiral down into the central core/sun--which is probably what is happening to us, right now.

If this is the case, then to quote Egon from Ghostbusters, "It would be bad." Though it does explain the quiet sun, regarding sunspots. We cannot observe atoms and dust entering the sun (too small and too bright a background). What may be happening is that this dust is forming an insulating blanket on the corona, increasing the amounts of plasma and not yet sinking (through increased mass via atomic fusion) to the core where it can be combusted. The result: the core runs low on fuel and burns slower and quieter--until that dust mass sinks in, then it will get "interesting" with all that "gas" being poured on the core fire.

Of course, like any contained system under pressure--and higher pressure now--when a sunspot thredule DOES break through, it should show some more energetic characteristics than the sunspots of the regular cycle. I believe one of those sunspots is being observed, right now.

I've seen David's data on a dustier solar system back in 2005, and it does agree with the other reports I've seen from half a century ago. The only difference is that we aren't going through any galactic plane; it's just a normal process of stellar recondensation from the old supernova.
Thanks for clarifying. I'm in no position to confirm or infirm what you present here so I will have take your word for it but it sure sounds like this a calm before the (solar) storm scenario...

Re: Sunspot cycle anomalies

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:55 pm
by Ilkka
daniel wrote:The only difference is that we aren't going through any galactic plane; it's just a normal process of stellar recondensation from the old supernova.
So its the sun eating itself in other words. Didnt thought as much of these things before since its not my area of expertise. So I tend to just see how the more suitable people think of that stuff. Or perhaps I'll join in also in relatively not too distant future.