Lozion wrote:Sorry daniel but you're being cryptic again, are you saying we have company and if yes who is it, or is it more sarcasm?
Yes, but I am not sure who or what it is, as the relative dimension stabilizer is still malfunctioning in the TARDIS, and I'm stuck on Earth and can't go look for myself.
Psychics I have spoken with refer to "gods," but that could be any of the SM domain, Titans, Annunaki, Annunaki-the Next Generation... I have no "insider" contacts in the SM realm, so I have no hard info there.
Lozion wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe you disagree with most New Age proponents about recent or soon-to-come visitation by ET's (blue beam. etc) but isnt that what you're saying in this post albeit with the difference being that those are Annunaki? I shirk away from a dialectic that says Other ET= bull, Annunaki= truth...
My life experiences have taught me that Nature tells the truth, whereas people will lie at the drop of a hat--and many times, they don't even know they are doing it, because they have bad info, misunderstood something, or it has become habitual. Hence, I made a decision to form my understandings about "natural consequences"--what can be derived from Nature. Part of that decision is that I do not have much confidence in "channeled" material (as I once did), and since most ETs are "channeled," well, I guess that you could update your equation to "Channeled ET = bull." Having met LMs face-to-face, and seen SMs at Montauk, I know that other, intelligent, technically-advanced life DOES exist and it is not all from this planet. I have seen MANY UFOs in my life, as I seem to be sensitive to that type of energy they emit, and am always looking in the right place, at the right time. I learned early on that there's a lot "out there" that I don't understand, which is why my
curiosity drives me to research.
Larson's Reciprocal System is the closest thing I have found that covers the widest range of "natural consequences" in a scientific sense. In the structure of Larson's Universe, habitable planets in this region of space are far and few between, so I accept that "natural consequence" in my thought processes. However, if you've been following the RS2 post on
The Visibility of Stars and Galaxies (Problem), then you'll know that the RS2 research may indicate that there may be a rather large error in "scale," specifically that all those far-off "galaxies" may not be galaxies, at all (as indicated by hi-res imaging), but NEARBY solar systems. (If you miscalculate stereoscopic principles, something that is small and nearby can
appear as something extremely large and far away.) This is a massive "game changer" if proven to be true, as the 10,937 "galaxies" currently in the Celestia database would mean that there are actually 10,937 "solar systems" within spitting distance of Earth. Granted, that consequence is like getting hit in the face with a sledge hammer, but if it is true that Astronomers have astronomic distances "backwards" as well... then, I'll have to rethink a lot of things and I guess put out another paper on what I find.
And PLEASE understand that I'm just a
traveler on the Great Path, sharing my "note book" on what I've found along my journey to assist others in their travels. My papers and comments are NOT any kind of absolute truth--they are just HOW I understand things at the time I present them, based on the path's I've chosen to walk over the course of my life. And I am continuing to "push on" into unexplored regions, but that also means that the understandings I have will CHANGE with time, knowledge and experience. If you need "absolutes," then you've got all the conventional sciences and explanations. If you prefer to "go with the flow" and SEE what is out there, then grab your backpack and join the hike.