South Africa is a rather unusual place... Lloyd Pye's work shows that the South Africans are the only human race that does not have ANY Neanderthal DNA (with the possible exception of the Olmec, but I don't believe anyone has ever tested the remaining DNA fragments). The rest of us range from 4-10%. Consider the implications.Lozion wrote:He's pretty adamant Adamus was created at one of the major archeological sites in SA; remember the scene with the african shaman who was initiated in his youth where it all began? But after reading daniel's last post on the 4 original races, I'm thinking maybe the archetypal worker (black) couple was created in Enki's command post in SA and not E-Din. Would make sense and explain the shaman's belief.
Homo Sapiens Ethicus-Part 3 of the Anthropology Series
Moderator:daniel
Power out? Let's see if many hands can make the lights work.
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii
Re: Homo Sapiens Ethicus-Part 3 of the Anthropology Series
Many different races here. Any specific one you are referring to daniel?
Re: Homo Sapiens Ethicus-Part 3 of the Anthropology Series
You'd have to check with Lloyd Pye; his published works did not go into that level of detail and I don't have any tribal information on the region.infinity wrote:Many different races here. Any specific one you are referring to daniel?
Power out? Let's see if many hands can make the lights work.
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii
Re: Homo Sapiens Ethicus-Part 3 of the Anthropology Series
Who would you consider the 'native' ethnie in SA? Those would prolly be the descendants of that original couple... Yeah, I know its a debate...infinity wrote:Many different races here. Any specific one you are referring to daniel?
In rapport we thrive, in rivalry we strive.
Re: Homo Sapiens Ethicus-Part 3 of the Anthropology Series
If I were to venture a guess, I'd probably guess the Xhosa.Lozion wrote:Who would you consider the 'native' ethnie in SA? Those would prolly be the descendants of that original couple... Yeah, I know its a debate...
Power out? Let's see if many hands can make the lights work.
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii
Re: Homo Sapiens Ethicus-Part 3 of the Anthropology Series
According to Wikipedia:daniel wrote:You'd have to check with Lloyd Pye; his published works did not go into that level of detail and I don't have any tribal information on the region.infinity wrote:Many different races here. Any specific one you are referring to daniel?
In 2013 Pye was diagnosed with cancer and retired from active research and promotion of the starchild skull.
Sad.
What book would you recommend?
In rapport we thrive, in rivalry we strive.
Re: Homo Sapiens Ethicus-Part 3 of the Anthropology Series
So Mandela would be long time descendant of Enki's creation.daniel wrote:If I were to venture a guess, I'd probably guess the Xhosa.Lozion wrote:Who would you consider the 'native' ethnie in SA? Those would prolly be the descendants of that original couple... Yeah, I know its a debate...
No wonder Netanyahou finds a lame excuse (costs, of all things
) and refuses to go to SA to pay hommage... 
In rapport we thrive, in rivalry we strive.
Re: Homo Sapiens Ethicus-Part 3 of the Anthropology Series
daniel wrote: South Africa is a rather unusual place... Lloyd Pye's work shows that the South Africans are the only human race that does not have ANY Neanderthal DNA (with the possible exception of the Olmec, but I don't believe anyone has ever tested the remaining DNA fragments). The rest of us range from 4-10%. Consider the implications.
OK, I'm a bit confused here. How could they not have ANY Neanderthal DNA? I thought it was necessary in order for the hybrids to survive the environment?
Re: Homo Sapiens Ethicus-Part 3 of the Anthropology Series
If you look at human DNA, it is basically a chimpanzee with some small modifications. So plenty of natural resistance to the environment. I believe they used the various Neanderthal groups for local "updates" to the code, for customization of specific functions.T11 wrote:OK, I'm a bit confused here. How could they not have ANY Neanderthal DNA? I thought it was necessary in order for the hybrids to survive the environment?
One thing I have wondered about is the simian DNA. The ancient texts imply that they Annunaki brought their own slaves with them, but they were basically clones and automatons. They formed the template for man, which means the clone slaves were basically simian to begin with. It may be the simian pattern is common on other planets, or that they just got those slaves from the Titans visit to Tiamat, earlier on, and brought them back.
Pye's book on Intervention Theory is really good, and covers most of the genetic bases.Lozion wrote:What book would you recommend?
Power out? Let's see if many hands can make the lights work.
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii
Re: Homo Sapiens Ethicus-Part 3 of the Anthropology Series
Thanks for the clarification. Well, the Pleiadian Nordics supposedly look "just like us," so who created them? The chances of that seem odd if we're really just the Annunaki's simian soup. And what exactly are the implications of the South Africans lacking Neanderthal DNA? Just wondering if this could be related: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum ... 430639/pg1daniel wrote: If you look at human DNA, it is basically a chimpanzee with some small modifications. So plenty of natural resistance to the environment. I believe they used the various Neanderthal groups for local "updates" to the code, for customization of specific functions.
One thing I have wondered about is the simian DNA. The ancient texts imply that they Annunaki brought their own slaves with them, but they were basically clones and automatons. They formed the template for man, which means the clone slaves were basically simian to begin with. It may be the simian pattern is common on other planets, or that they just got those slaves from the Titans visit to Tiamat, earlier on, and brought them back.