deepfsh wrote:BTW, I noticed that Larson wrote two books on the economy - has anyone read them? What does his theory say about the employment issues in the existing economic system?
Those books were written from material and ideas he got in the 1920s-1930s, during the Great Depression. They predate the Reciprocal System and actually lay out some of the basic RS concepts, on an economic level. Larson treats economy as a mechanical and chemical system, analyzes it to see where the "machine is broken" and how to go about making repairs, so the economic machine runs smoothly. His techniques are still valid today, and if updated a bit and applied, would FIX the global economy, making everyone prosperous. And that's exactly why it will never happen--the world bankers don't want a healthy economy, because it transfers too much power to the slaves. Much easier to rob from a system that can't maintain itself.
Lozion wrote:Why not? More fuel to the debate and inquiring minds are open to new ideas.
Because it will be taken out of context by slave mentality. What is being done is nothing more than a
courtesy, not
assistance or saving. When a person is carrying armfuls of grocery bags, it is courteous to hold a door open for them to make their "path" a little easier. But when you hold the door open
every time they go through, then it becomes
expected, and that one time you don't hold it open, they'll walk right into it. There becomes a point at which
easier becomes
obstructive. In industrial society where everything is automated and people are lazy, you do a courtesy one time, and it's expected every time. There is no longer much of a dividing line, so if someone
doesn't know that "bit of luck" was a courtesy provided by someone/something else, then it cannot become obstructive. Which is why I said that.
Lozion wrote:So it is a solar-transition based evolution?
That's part of it. Certain courtesies could not be extended without "more power."
Lozion wrote:Interesting, so you do agree with the concept of a Star Trek type Prime directive of non-intervention? I was under the impression this was a sham used by New Age pushers to justify ET inaction and keep the Hopium pumping.
The Star Trek non-interference directive applies to other physical entities, not the ascended. And based on the LMs, I don't believe there is a species out there that pays attention to non-intervention. Humanity is a consequence of direct intervention by the Annunaki on the native life; and I know the LMs have traveled to many other worlds. I think the Star Trek non-interference directive is a "Posted: NO TRESPASSING" sign on Earth, more than anything else.
Ascended beings CANNOT intervene, because they have completed the physical side of their evolution. If they do, then they are no longer ascended, so it becomes a moot point. It's not a rule, just a natural consequence of crossing that quantum boundary.
infinity wrote:Does anyone here know of examples of who I'm talking about? Just a yes or no would suffice. No need to mention names.
Kind of obvious, isn't it? Just remember that a channel IS NOT the entity, any more than the instrument is the musician. And since all you ever see is the "instrument," how can you tell, for sure, who is tooting that horn?