Good point. So do you feel contact and intervention are one in the same here, or different contexts? I guess if your gonna take on the task of traveling to another world, you might as well get acquainted with the locals? (trade some beads,etc... ) This is a direct and physical interaction & not a channeled one, hence no hiding behind the tooted horn! loldaniel wrote:The Star Trek non-interference directive applies to other physical entities, not the ascended. And based on the LMs, I don't believe there is a species out there that pays attention to non-intervention. Humanity is a consequence of direct intervention by the Annunaki on the native life; and I know the LMs have traveled to many other worlds. I think the Star Trek non-interference directive is a "Posted: NO TRESPASSING" sign on Earth, more than anything else.
A sad departure
Moderator:daniel
Re: A sad departure
All excellent posts gents, a full course meal for the mind! Will ponder and comment...
In rapport we thrive, in rivalry we strive.
Re: A sad departure
I thought there has to be a solution within the scope of his theory also for the economic issues. Is there a possibility to use that knowledge in the current economic model and witness a gradual evolution towards something more ethical, cooperative, rapport-based, as you like to say. Maybe 'time banking' and similar initiatives are/were an attempt to make some changes, although the former is still based on "credit".daniel wrote:His techniques are still valid today, and if updated a bit and applied, would FIX the global economy, making everyone prosperous.
As you said yesterday, we can choose whether we'll use or not an opportunity. If one can make a good example, some people might recognize it and try it themselves, thus contributing to (at least) their local community.daniel wrote:And that's exactly why it will never happen--the world bankers don't want a healthy economy, because it transfers too much power to the slaves. Much easier to rob from a system that can't maintain itself.
"You talk the talk ... do you walk the walk?" Kubrick, Full Metal Jacket
Re: A sad departure
This is exactly what I was thinking when I stopped listening channels or between starting and stopping listening channeled material. I surely cant tell for sure I only have their "word" for it, which means I need faith (mostly blind) to believe such information. It seems all to be so good and wonderful and world seemed to be very alive so I went out to be more happy, but practically nothing ever changed, so I stopped to believe such things and keep open mind to other more physical things. I used to say "I believe when I see it" and others might aswell, when I heard "Bashar" say its the other way around actually that one needs to believe first and then one can perceive. Maybe there is some "mystical" (temporal) truth in this because of the "Immortals" that Daniel wrote about in his papers, or simply intuitional truth in that. So I would suggest that believe in yourself more than anyone else, since in the end you and you only are true and real enough to yourself. Funny quote I heard in some comedy movie once "Believe in the ball and throw yourself"- Mr.T. I think this was in "Not Another Teen Movie".daniel wrote:Just remember that a channel IS NOT the entity, any more than the instrument is the musician. And since all you ever see is the "instrument," how can you tell, for sure, who is tooting that horn?
Re: A sad departure
Forget the ET's guys.
Daniel's referring to our inner world friends giving us the opportunities...
-----------------------
Daniel,
My old wise friend who told me about the SM's being the "gods" referenced an old prophecy(potential timeline) involving the LMs coming out of Middle Earth en masse. Are you familiar with this?
And do you believe this has already happened or are there still alot still hanging around?
Daniel's referring to our inner world friends giving us the opportunities...
-----------------------
Daniel,
My old wise friend who told me about the SM's being the "gods" referenced an old prophecy(potential timeline) involving the LMs coming out of Middle Earth en masse. Are you familiar with this?
And do you believe this has already happened or are there still alot still hanging around?
Re: A sad departure
-OM- wrote:Forget the ET's guys.
Daniel's referring to our inner world friends giving us the opportunities...
-----------------------
Daniel,
My old wise friend who told me about the SM's being the "gods" referenced an old prophecy(potential timeline) involving the LMs coming out of Middle Earth en masse. Are you familiar with this?
And do you believe this has already happened or are there still alot still hanging around?
Interesting, care to elaborate? Native american prophecy?
In rapport we thrive, in rivalry we strive.
Re: A sad departure
Let me ask a question in response... if you were an LM, living in safety and security in a 5000-year-old Utopia, would you be promoting a departure, en masse? If so, why?-OM- wrote:My old wise friend who told me about the SM's being the "gods" referenced an old prophecy(potential timeline) involving the LMs coming out of Middle Earth en masse. Are you familiar with this?
Well, in the last few years there were all these sightings of hundreds of small, flying objects seen across the western coast of the Americas... but I believe they were also trailing a sign that said, "So long, and thanks for all the fish."-OM- wrote:And do you believe this has already happened or are there still alot still hanging around?
Power out? Let's see if many hands can make the lights work.
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii
Re: A sad departure
Well, several answers are possible, but nearly all of them involve a change in the "safety and security" of the utopia.daniel wrote:Let me ask a question in response... if you were an LM, living in safety and security in a 5000-year-old Utopia, would you be promoting a departure, en masse? If so, why?-OM- wrote:My old wise friend who told me about the SM's being the "gods" referenced an old prophecy(potential timeline) involving the LMs coming out of Middle Earth en masse. Are you familiar with this?
or they have accomplished what they needed to and no longer need the Utopia for what it was originally used for.
Yes, when the pictures of the LM became public, I immediately thought of what he told me and wondered, why now?daniel wrote:Well, in the last few years there were all these sightings of hundreds of small, flying objects seen across the western coast of the Americas... but I believe they were also trailing a sign that said, "So long, and thanks for all the fish."-OM- wrote:And do you believe this has already happened or are there still alot still hanging around?
(haven't read Hitchhikers in over 25 years. Took me a while to figure out why you kept saying this)
Re: A sad departure
Ahhh, the dolphins. This is reminding me of what I've chosen to use as my band name ... "lilly wave" ... John C. Lilly ... he loved the dolphins.daniel wrote: Well, in the last few years there were all these sightings of hundreds of small, flying objects seen across the western coast of the Americas... but I believe they were also trailing a sign that said, "So long, and thanks for all the fish."
Maybe the LM's need to come above ground because during the transition, or as I like to call it, 'a level up', they can't remain in the inner world. Just a thought.
(As a side note, guys ... be happy you are male, being a woman is not easy ... hormones and all.)
"silence is the consent to slavery" ~ Daniel
Re: A sad departure
I'm not sure the increase of "travel" from our little friends should be interpreted as an exodus. The human race made a very big leap in traffic when we started trading across the waters. Even more so when we built highways, and passenger airplanes. Perhaps the increase of sightings or the increase in travel has more to do with them having relations with other races than it has to do with something that humans do or don't do. After all, everything isn't just about us.
Or, as OM put it, it could have something to do with the safety of their home. But that safety could have nothing to do with us - perhaps changes in the planet's evolution, or the solar system's evolution, is more a probable cause.
But why are we speculating when I suspect someone here already knows the reason why?
Or, as OM put it, it could have something to do with the safety of their home. But that safety could have nothing to do with us - perhaps changes in the planet's evolution, or the solar system's evolution, is more a probable cause.
But why are we speculating when I suspect someone here already knows the reason why?